Page 4 of 6

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:42 am
by trek3159
I don't know......these odd numbered nacelles seem like they would throw the whole warp field out of alignment.....unless one was for additional power for the weapons and shields maybe.... :D

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 2:11 pm
by Moongrim
MEATLOAFr wrote:
shiftdel wrote:For me is irrelevant the position of the nacelles above or below the saucer, if the design is good, I'm OK with that. I like a lot of the Miranda and Akira designs, and they both have nacelles below the saucer, so, np for me...
Agreed - as long as i looks good (and is a plausible design) I don't care where the nacelles are located - or how many there are
A modified Dreadnought.
Image

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:50 pm
by el gato
MEATLOAFr wrote:
shiftdel wrote:For me is irrelevant the position of the nacelles above or below the saucer, if the design is good, I'm OK with that. I like a lot of the Miranda and Akira designs, and they both have nacelles below the saucer, so, np for me...
Agreed - as long as i looks good (and is a plausible design) I don't care where the nacelles are located - or how many there are
y'all are no fun :P

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:05 pm
by DefiantClient
Moongrim wrote:
MEATLOAFr wrote:
shiftdel wrote:For me is irrelevant the position of the nacelles above or below the saucer, if the design is good, I'm OK with that. I like a lot of the Miranda and Akira designs, and they both have nacelles below the saucer, so, np for me...
Agreed - as long as i looks good (and is a plausible design) I don't care where the nacelles are located - or how many there are
A modified Dreadnought.
Image
Needs more nacelles. :lol:

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:44 pm
by slawton
DefiantClient wrote:Needs more nacelles. :lol:
Image

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:18 pm
by MEATLOAFr
Moongrim wrote:
MEATLOAFr wrote:
shiftdel wrote:For me is irrelevant the position of the nacelles above or below the saucer, if the design is good, I'm OK with that. I like a lot of the Miranda and Akira designs, and they both have nacelles below the saucer, so, np for me...
Agreed - as long as i looks good (and is a plausible design) I don't care where the nacelles are located - or how many there are
A modified Dreadnought.
Image
love the tag "no one takes credit for this"

should be called the USS Voltron - 5 sets of engines combine to make a super cruiser

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:38 pm
by el gato
MEATLOAFr wrote:love the tag "no one takes credit for this"
My favorite part is the ship's name: USS Overkill. Take that, fanboys :P

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:26 am
by Greyryder
What!? No rollbars?

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:16 pm
by Moongrim
Greyryder wrote:What!? No rollbars?
Nor a Spoiler....

Re: Inverted Miranda

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:51 pm
by NCC1966
el gato wrote:But can we all agree that Federation ships shouldn't have the nacelles beneath the saucer? ;) :P
I couldn't DISAGREE more with this.
shiftdel wrote:For me is irrelevant the position of the nacelles above or below the saucer, if the design is good, I'm OK with that.
I couldn't AGREE more with this.

IMO it's not the position of the nacelles that characterize the Federation ships. Actually it never was about this.

;)